도로법위반
The defendant is innocent.
1. Details of the facts charged [the summary order subject to review: the District Court 2014 Go-Ma1037- Decided January 5, 2005 : the District Court 2004 Go-Ma32627 dated October 27, 2004 ] A violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 12:58 on October 27, 2004 (the summary order subject to review: about 2002 Go-Ma49762 dated December 26, 2002: the District Court / [a summary order subject to review: approximately 2002 Go-Ma49762 dated September 27, 2002] A violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 15:30 on September 27, 2002 by the defendant's employee [a violation of the vehicle operation restriction around September 14, 200 the Seoul District Court / [a summary order: approximately 200 on September 14, 2000)
2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.
Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.