beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.08.11 2019나23670 (1)

소유권확인

Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff’s real estate stated in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 3.

Reasons

1. Grounds for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are stated in this part of the facts.

항 부분을 아래 『』와 같이 고치고, 제1항의 인정근거 기재 부분에 “갑 제31, 33호증”을 추가하는 것 외에는 제1심판결 이유 부분 제1항 기재와 같으므로, 민사소송법 제420조 본문에 의하여 이를 인용한다.

D. The Plaintiff’s family register of the Plaintiff Line was removed from the column 6.25 on or around June 30, 1955, and was drafted again on or around June 30, 1955. According to the Plaintiff’s original copy, the deceased J’s permanent domicile is “K at Priju,” and the Plaintiff’s father’s father. According to the Plaintiff’s original copy, the deceased I’s permanent domicile is “K at Priju,” and the former head is “K at Priju,” and the former head is the deceased’s 15th family register of the deceased (Article 25(1) of the Civil Act and Article 11 of the Shipbuilding’s Decree). According to the former custom, the deceased’s heir is inherited to the deceased’s heir, and the deceased’s heir is the deceased’s heir’s 15th family of the 196th family register of the deceased and the deceased’s 15th family of the 196th family of the Republic of Korea (see, 25th of Korea).

The deceased deceased and the deceased deceased and succeeded to his property, and the deceased J left the plaintiff and N on March 31, 201, who was his wife M and children, but W and N have renounced inheritance, and the plaintiff inherited the property of the deceased J alone.

A person shall be appointed.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff independently inherited each of the lands of this case by the plaintiff's assertion deceased, and the land Nos. 1 and 3 among them are unregistered and entered in the forestry register.