Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine, 50,000.

Defendant

B A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company manufacturing elevators, and Defendant A is a representative director of the Defendant Co., Ltd.

1. When Defendant A business operator installs or alters air pollution emission facilities, he/she shall install air pollution prevention facilities to emit pollutants from such emission facilities below the permissible emission levels;

Nevertheless, the defendant from January 7, 2013 to the same year.

5. From 14:00 until 31:14:00, the Defendant Company reported at the Defendant Company’s place of business in Kimpo-si to install and operate two air-conditioning facilities.

2. Defendant A, the representative of Defendant Company, did not install air pollution prevention facilities as above with respect to the Defendant Company’s business at the date and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation grounds, reports on the installation of standby emission facilities, and photographs on control;

1. Defendant A who has the relevant legal provisions and choice of punishment concerning the facts of a crime: A, inclusive, Article 89 subparagraph 2 of the Clean Air Conservation Act, Article 26 (1) of the Clean Air Conservation Act, and Article 95, subparagraph 2 of Article 89 and Article 26 (1) of the Clean Air Conservation Act; and

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;