도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On April 16, 2004, the summary of the facts charged by the Defendant’s employee B violated the restriction on the operation of roads exceeding 0.21m above the restriction standard by carrying a container of 4.21m high at the above vehicle at the inspection station at the location of the 12.5km point in the Seo-dong Highway Incheon Highway, Seodong Highway, Incheon.
2. As to Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Mar. 5, 1995; Act No. 12013, Nov. 28, 2013; Act No. 12214, Dec. 14, 2015; Act No. 12068, Mar. 16, 2014>
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.