However, in light of the fact that each of the instant crimes was committed on one’s own, and that the F was not involved in the instant crime, while the Defendant and its employees, each of the statements made by L, H, and N is difficult to believe because it was not consistent, and in light of the fact that E, at the time of the towing of a towing vehicle, made several calls by the F, and the “the result of the winter analysis,” the F was not at the site, and the Defendant, L, H, H, J, and N made a statement to the effect that each of the instant reports was different from the facts, the Defendant clearly recognizes and reported the falsity of the instant report.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the charged facts of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination:

A. A. Around August 7, 2011, the summary of the facts charged reported E and F to the criminal department of the Yeongdeungpo-dong Police Station located in the Sindong-gu in the Sindong-si in the Sindong-si in the Sindong-si in Yong-si in the Sindong-si in the Sindong-si in the Republic of Korea, and was present as a victim and made

As above, the Defendant was investigated as a victim at the police station, and was accompanied by a slope G, a police officer belonging to the above police station, and ① F and E are accompanied by an I towing vehicle operated by his employee H on August 4, 201, with an Aluminium exit room, around 03:30 on the same day, the K towing vehicle operated by his employee J is accompanied by an Aluminium exit room network, and around 04:00 on the same day, the towing vehicle operated by his employee L is accompanied by an Aluminium exit room, which is accompanied by an Aluminium exit room, which is operated by his employee at around 04:30 on the same day. ② At around 05:30 on the same day, F and E are able to tow an O towing vehicle operated by N of his employee on the same day.