beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2021.02.18 2020고정673

과실치상

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. A person who supplements the facts charged shall have the duty of care to prevent any person from putting a dog into or out of a dog in order to prevent him/her from sustaining any person around the dog;

Nevertheless, on June 7, 2020, the Defendant, at around 15:30 on June 7, 2020, failed to install safety devices, such as cutting a line of a dog raised by the Defendant on the back side of the Gyeonggi-si apartment B apartment C, or cutting the dog to a dog, and caused the Defendant to suffer injury to the Defendant’s animal stuffing that requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act;

(c) Expression of intention not to punish: Submission of a written agreement after the prosecution of this case;

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;