2. The judgment of the court below is deemed to be inappropriate in light of the following factors: the defendant's intention to commit a crime is against the mistake while committing a crime; the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; and the defendant's vehicle is subscribed to the Financial Cooperative; however, despite the fact that the defendant's failure to perform his/her duty by driving a vehicle in violation of the signal as a taxi driver is not less complicated; the victim's injury is relatively heavy; and the defendant's efforts to recover damage are not sufficiently agreed with the victim; and the defendant's efforts to recover damage is not sufficient; and the defendant's age, character, character, occupation and environment, circumstances and result of the crime; and the various sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, such as the defendant's circumstances after committing a crime,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.