2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. Relevant Plaintiffs A, B, and B are children of Nonparty H, and Plaintiff C is the spouse of the above G, and Plaintiff D, E, and F are children born between Plaintiff C and the above G.

B. Circumstances 1 of the construction of the temporary road ) Defendant Substitute Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

(1) On February 14, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Non-Party Down Construction Co., Ltd. with the Non-Party Down Construction Co., Ltd. for the construction price of KRW 67,294,97,00 for the J-A-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U

(2) Around August 2008, in order to use the instant valley as an access road to vehicles in the process of implementing a bridge and m tunnel construction connected to the instant valley at the end point to the above end point point and the end point of the instant tunnel (hereinafter referred to as the “instant map”), the instant map was formed between the end point and the end point of the instant tunnel. In order to use it as an access road to the construction vehicles, the Defendant Company completed the instant map on December 2008 after obtaining approval from the Defendant Gyeonggi-do to build a temporary road with a height of 9.5 meters high from the soil shed to the end point and the end point of the instant tunnel (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Ga”), and completed the instant Ga around December 2008, at the bottom of the instant map, to smoothly resolve the instant water flow problem.

3) On May 6, 2011, Defendant Gyeonggi-do concluded a contract with Defendant Company and Daedo Construction Co., Ltd. to increase the said construction cost to KRW 75,192,014,000, and to change an end-user institution to the road business office of Gyeonggi-do. C. The reasons leading to the concentration and accident occurred 1) from the instant Do to the point where the 500m or 600m or 60m lower is H.