The first instance court dismissed all the claims of plaintiffs G and F and the remaining plaintiffs' non-disqualified deposits, and partly accepted the claims of the remaining plaintiffs' non-paid annual leave allowances.

With respect to this, the plaintiffs and the defendant appealed against each part of the judgment against them, and the judgment before remanding the case dismissed each of the claims of the plaintiffs G and the remaining plaintiffs' non-contentious claims, including the modification of the purport of the claim, and partly admitted the appeal against the remaining plaintiffs' non-paid monthly leave allowances claim.

Accordingly, each of the plaintiffs and the defendant appealed. The Supreme Court reversed the part against the plaintiff G, BG, BD, IE, BE, BF, F, BM, and BS (hereinafter "Plaintiff G")'s claim for unpaid annual leave allowance and the part against the defendant's remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiff G, F, BM and BS (hereinafter "the remaining plaintiffs of this case") and remanded this part of the case. The remaining appeals of the plaintiff G et al. and the remaining appeals of the defendant were dismissed.

Therefore, among the plaintiffs' claims, ① the remaining claims except for the part against the plaintiffs among the claims for the unpaid annual leave allowance of Plaintiffs G, F, BM, and BS among the claims for the unpaid annual leave allowance, that is, the above plaintiffs' winning part of the claims was accepted before the remanding part of the above plaintiffs' winning part of the claims for the unpaid annual leave allowance of Plaintiffs BS, and the remaining plaintiffs' remaining claims for the unpaid annual leave allowance were dismissed in entirety.

All of the claims for the unpaid monthly leave allowance and the claims for the unpaid non-contentious amount, and the claims for the unpaid monthly leave allowance of Plaintiffs BG, BD, IE, BE, and BF.