On January 25, 2014, at around 00:10, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the victim C (the age of 42) who was aware of the fact in front of the Jeonnam University Library located in 77, Jeonnam-gu, Gwangju, and the talking about water, and the victim who returned from the Defendant, followed by the victim's her return to her return from her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to her return to the next victim,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Determination on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act relating to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 of the Criminal Act

1. The summary of the assertion is that the Defendant, at the time of the instant case, was under dispute with the victim as a religious issue, and the victim was injured due to the fact that the part of the victim’s platform was frightened, due to the Defendant’s appearance, and the part of the victim’s platform was not supported by the victim’s intention after the victim’s injury.

2. In a case where the statements of the witness, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, the court of determination shall not reject them without permission, unless there exist any separate and reliable data to deem the credibility of the statements objectively acceptable from an objective perspective (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2004Do362, Apr. 15, 2005; 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). In addition, in a case where the victim of the crime of injury submitted a written diagnosis of injury, the date and time when the victim prepared the written diagnosis of injury is adjacent to the time and time when the injury occurred, and there is no special circumstance to suspect the credibility of the written diagnosis of injury, and where the part and degree of the injury correspond to the causes or details of the injury alleged by the victim, the victim is assaulted by a third party around that time.