The defendant is not the defendant.

2. The reasoning for this part of the court’s determination as to the legitimacy of the claim for a corrective statement as indicated in the Attachment 1-1 is as stated in Paragraph 2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

3. Judgment on the merits

A. The plaintiff's assertion that "L and M have a special human relationship (this case's No. 1 and No. 2)" (this case's No. 1 and No. 2) is true (the "O dispute fact" hereinafter), ② "L had an internal examiner conduct an internal examiner's selection examination (the first and second articles of this case's No. 1 and No. 2), ③ "An external examiner is composed of persons connected with L and BS academic societies, etc. (the number of actual participants in the program of this case)" (iv) "the number of actual participants in the program of this case is nothing more than 100 (the number of actual participants in the program of this case's No. 5,6, 7, 8, 9). The defendant was obligated to intervene in the news report of this case in the process of producing the article to inform the whole world of the contents of the program of this case's No. 1, but the defendant made the article of this case's corrective news article of this case's No. 34).

B. The reasons why this court is stated in this part of the judgment of the first instance court as to the facts of issues Nos. 1 to 5 are 3- Of the reasons for the judgment

C. Inasmuch as the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5) are the same, they shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(c) 6.