However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is the father of the victim D(10 years of age).

The defendant was in conflict with his wife due to the problem of discipline of the ordinary victim, and due to this, he was dissatisfied with the victim.

1. Around July 2014, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, at his residence, 102 Dong 1510, on the ground that the Defendant was unable to use letters well, on the ground that the Defendant used for the victim’s use, such as tear gas, knife, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

2. At around 11:00 on June 7, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim (i.e., the victim’s head, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife knife knife) at the same place as indicated in paragraph 1.

3. Around June 14, 2015, at the same place as indicated in paragraph 1, the Defendant took a bath, on the ground that the victim considered his eye, such as “I see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, e.g., bitch bitch.”

Accordingly, the defendant committed physical and emotional abuse against a child victim.

[Judgment on the Defendant and his defense counsel]

1. Summary of the defendant's defense counsel;

A. The Defendant did not engage in the same conduct as stated in the facts constituting a crime against the victim, and only sought a decoration against the victim.

(1) Section 1 (hereinafter referred to as the “chief”).

The defendant's act against the victim constitutes a parent's discipline and cannot be deemed an abuse that causes harm to the child's body under the Child Welfare Act.

2. Determination

A. (1) According to the following evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the defendant is a child.