On November 20, 2014, at around 01:15, the Defendant: (a) took an issue of taxi engineer and fee in front of the apartment complex in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, the same number of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, as an apartment complex; (b) took an inquiry of the police officer and fare from the police officer D and policeman belonging to the Incheon Samsan Police Station C commander of the Incheon Samsan Police Station, and tried to see the taxi engineer; and (c) was discharged from the police officer, the Defendant took a bath to the police officer: (a) “I am off the four clothes; (b) I am off the four clothes; (c) I am back the shoulder; (d) I am off the back of the seat of the taxi; and (d) I am off the roof of D’s slope that the Defendant was removed by hand; and (d) I am off the bridge by putting it up against this part of D’s bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. The relevant provision of the criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the choice of punishment, the reason for sentencing of sentence for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of recommendation] No basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of obstruction of performance of official duties) [the decision of sentence] [the decision of sentence] of the instant crime is active transfer of assault, such as where two suspended periods of execution were under probation and probation following it, where police officers were under probation, and where the police officers were under probation, breathing the breath and bridges.

As the defendant committed the instant crime under the meaning of the period of suspension of execution as a former police officer and the importance of the obstruction of performance of official duties.

In consideration of the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit a crime, that the police D does not want the punishment of the defendant, that the defendant does not have any criminal record or criminal punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties, and that the defendant does not have any criminal record or criminal punishment, a punishment lower than the lower limit of the recommended standard.