명의신탁해지로 인한 주식반한 청구의소
1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff and the Defendant are the Plaintiff of the shares listed in the separate sheet.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
1. The facts in the separate sheet of the determination on the cause of the claim do not conflict between the parties.
According to the above facts of recognition, a title trust agreement exists between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the shares listed in the separate sheet. It is recognized that the instant complaint containing the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the title trust was terminated by being served on the Defendant. Since the Defendant is dissatisfied with this as a reply, the Plaintiff has the interest to seek confirmation on the fact that the said shares are the shareholders
In regard to this, the defendant alleged that he was a beneficial shareholder because he contributed to a certain portion of the company, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, so the defendant's above assertion is without merit
2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and acceptable.