The interpretation of penal provisions shall be strict, and it shall not be permitted because it is against the principle of no punishment without the law to excessively expand or analogically interpret the meaning of the provision of an express statement to the disadvantage of the defendant

(1) Article 2 subparag. 5 of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 11047, Sept. 15, 201) and Article 2 subparag. 5 of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 11572, Dec. 18, 2012); and Article 2 subparag. 5 of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 11572, Dec. 18, 2012) stipulate that “child and juveniles” or “persons or representations that may be perceived as children, juveniles, or juveniles” appear to commit an act falling under any of subparagraph 4 or other sexual acts, and defined as “child and juveniles’ obscene acts” as “child and juveniles’ obscene acts,” and Article 8(1) of the same Act provides for “the production or import of children or juveniles’ pornography, etc., or the exportation of children or juveniles’ obscene acts as “the aforementioned acts”.