beta
(영문) 대법원 1987. 8. 29.자 87마689 결정

[부동산경락허가결정][공1987.11.1.(811),1543]

Main Issues

The grounds for the reappeal that the content of another written statement is invoked.

Summary of Decision

The grounds of re-appeal shall be expressed in a manner that directly states in the re-appeal petition or the re-appeal petition, and other written contents shall not be invoked. Therefore, the re-appeal ground cannot be viewed as a legitimate ground of re-appeal that the re-appellant is claiming to invoke the grounds of re-appeal.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 413 of the Civil Procedure Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Order 76Ma168 Dated June 25, 1979 82Ma777 Dated December 22, 1982

Re-appellant

Re-appellant

United States of America

Seoul Central District Court Order 87Ra386 Dated June 18, 1987

Text

The reappeal is dismissed.

Reasons

As to the grounds of reappeal:

The grounds of reappeal should be expressed in a manner that directly states in the re-appeal petition or the re-appeal petition, and other written contents may not be invoked. Therefore, in this case, the re-appeal ground cannot be viewed as a legitimate ground of reappeal that the re-appellant is entitled to invoke the grounds of reappeal.

Therefore, the reappeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Yoon Il-young (Presiding Justice)