(b) homicide;

C. Special obstruction of performance

(d) Violation of the Act on the Safety Management of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, Etc.;

E. Probation and attachment of an electronic device against a specific criminal suspect

Violation of the Act

(f) Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, it did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

On the other hand, the argument that since the crime of murder is not provided for in the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, the defendant cannot be punished as a crime of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.

However, the argument that the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate act or self-defense is not a legitimate ground for appeal since the defendant's act is not a ground for appeal or the court below's decision is not subject to judgment ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Kim Jong-il

Chief Justice Lee Dong-won

Justices Park Il-san