(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017. 10. 18. 선고 2017가단5033431 판결집행공탁에 대하여 배당절차에 불복이 있는 당사자는 배당이의의 소 등의 방법으로 다툴 수 있을 뿐임[각하]
Parties who are dissatisfied with the distribution procedure against the deposit can only dispute by means of a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution, etc.
It is inappropriate for a party who is dissatisfied with the distribution procedure of the executing court to seek confirmation of the right to claim the deposit by means of a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution, etc., and seek confirmation of the right to claim the deposit.
Article 449 of the Civil Code, Transferability of Claim
§ 450. Requirements for setting up assignment of designated assignment
2017 Ghana 503431 Confirmation of claim for withdrawal of deposit money
○ ○
Republic of Korea and 2
August 23, 2017
October 18, 2017
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Cheong-gu Office
□□□□□가 서울중앙지방법원 2016금제XXXXX호로 공탁한 2,157,347,210원 중 채무자 조○○에게 지급할 서울동부지방법원 2016타배XXX호 배당액 41,969,154원에 대한 공탁금출급청구권이 원고에게 있음을 확인한다.
1. The plaintiff's assertion
The reasons for the attached Form shall be as shown in the attached Form.
2. Determination
A. In a lawsuit for confirmation, there is a benefit of confirmation as a requirement for protection of rights, and the benefit of confirmation is recognized only when it is the most effective and appropriate means for the defendant to receive a confirmation judgment against the defendant, and the defendant to eliminate such apprehension and danger, so the defendant in a lawsuit for confirmation of confirmation shall be a person likely to cause apprehension and danger in the plaintiff's legal status by dispute over the plaintiff's rights or legal relations and shall have the benefit of confirmation against such defendant. In addition, when the garnishee deposits for execution, the court of execution shall commence the distribution procedure (Articles 252 subparagraph 2 and 248 of the Civil Execution Act). The distribution procedure shall commence when the garnishee deposits for execution (Articles 252 subparagraph 2 and 248 of the Civil Execution Act), and the distribution is made in accordance with the legal judgment of the court of execution on the priority order of the claim in the commenced distribution procedure
나. 위 법리에 비추어 이 사건에 관하여 보건대, 갑 제7호증의 기재에 의하면, 서울특별시가 2016. 8. 11. 주식회사 ■■■■■■의 □□□□□에 대한 환급금채권에 관하여 압류가 경합되었다는 이유로 민사집행법 제248조 제1항을 근거조항으로 하여 서울중앙지방법원 2016금제XXXXX호로 2,157,347,210원을 공탁한 사실이 인정되는바, 이 사건 공탁은 집행공탁이므로 집행법원의 배당절차에서 불복이 있는 당사자는 배당이의의 소 등의 방법으로 다툴 수 있을 뿐 별소로써 이 사건 공탁금출급청구권 확인을 구하는 것은 부적절하고 우회적인 분쟁해결방식이라 할 것이어서 이 사건 소는 확인의 이익이 없어 부적법하다.
C. Therefore, the instant lawsuit is unlawful and dismissed.