손해배상(기)
1. The request for intervention by an independent party intervenor shall be rejected;
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. Of the costs of lawsuit.
1. Basic facts
A. Article 6 of the former Urban Park Act (amended by Act No. 4571 of Aug. 5, 1993), Articles 24 and 25 of the former Urban Planning Act (amended by Act No. 4427 of Dec. 14, 1991), Article 6 of the former Urban Park Act (amended by Act No. 4571 of Aug. 5, 1993), Articles 24 and 25 of the former Urban Park Act (amended by Act No. 4427 of Dec. 14, 191), with respect to the land of this case, 161,152 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
B. The non-party clan created a F Park with park facilities, such as source facilities, park management facilities, sports facilities, etc., on the land of this case by no later than the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor until 1987. On January 22, 1987, the non-party clan obtained permission to change part of the Park Creation Project from the head of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the non-party clan established as part of the urban planning project on the land of this case pursuant to Article 4 of the former Public Health Act (amended by Act No. 5654, Jan. 21, 199; hereinafter the same shall apply) from the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (the head of Dongdaemun-gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, etc.).
C. On August 13, 1990, Nonparty 1 entered into a lease agreement with Nonparty 1 and two other persons on August 13, 1990 to lease all of the instant land and its ground facilities, goods, and operation rights until August 13, 2010, and the status of an urban planning project implementer for the said F Park.