If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, on February 20, 2019, the Defendant received 30,000 won per unit and sent 30,000 won to the person under whose name the Defendant entered the mobile phone in the name of the Defendant (B, C, D, E, and F).

Accordingly, the defendant mediated another person's communication or provided it for another person's communication using telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators.

Summary of Evidence

1. Investigation record of the criminal suspect against the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Documents and written statements of G;

1. The application of the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes on the Kakaok dialogue with A and Bridges, the content of the Kakaok dialogue with A and Bridges, and the application of the provisions of statutes on the Kakaok dialogue between A and H Information and Communications Business Operators;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the Telecommunications Business Act and Article 30 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;