beta
(영문) 대법원 2019.5.30.선고 2019도1485 판결

업무방해,사문서변조,변조사문서행사

Cases

2019Do1485 Business Interference, Alteration of private documents, and uttering of private documents

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Law Firm Sejong

Attorney Lee Ho-ho, Lee Dong-ho, Lee Dong-ho, Lee Dong-ho, Lee Jin, Kim Jin

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2018No730 Decided January 10, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

May 30, 2019:

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty) on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Min You-sook

Note 1 Justice Jo Hee-de

Justices Kim Jae-in

Justices Lee Jae-hwan

심급 사건
-서울남부지방법원 2018.4.25.선고 2017고단5572