2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

No business operator shall operate emission facilities without operating preventive facilities or emitting pollutants discharged from emission facilities, mixing with the air, in order to lower the degree of pollution.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant was in charge of environmental management in D Co., Ltd., which is engaged in the manufacturing of machinery and equipment parts in the window C in Changwon-si, on August 30, 2012, the Defendant was not in charge of environmental management on the grounds of damage to air preventive facilities, etc. while operating one string facility, one string facility, one string facility, and two string facilities, which are air pollutants, in the foregoing company on August

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. A written confirmation of violation, a business trip name, and a guidance and inspection table of emission facilities;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site of violation;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 95, 89 subparagraph 3 of the Clean Air Conservation Act and Article 31 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.