When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant shall be the Director D in the case of Namyang-si.

On February 8, 2014, at around 11:30, the Defendant assaulted the victim due to the following reasons: (a) the victim F (14 years of age, n, n, n) taking part in the E commercial building 202, which was divided by another student during class; (b) the victim’s head at the left-hand head part of the victim’s knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife on the floor;

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the chief executive officer and explanatory note;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant, while giving attention to the same reflector as the victim, has come to end with the victim’s words “self-furcing four” and committed the crime of this case. The defendant paid 80,000 won to the victim by mutual consent, the defendant paid 80,000 won to the victim by mutual consent, and the defendant has lived with the victim in good faith without any special criminal records, and the degree of assault against the victim is relatively minor. The judgment on the defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion is taken into account all the circumstances indicated in the records, such as the defendant’s age, character and behavior, motive, circumstance, degree of damage, and circumstances after the crime.

A. The Defendant alleged that he did not constitute assault but did not have an intention of assault since he did not commit an act of assault. However, the Defendant did not directly contact the body of the victim because he did not directly contact with the body of the victim because he did not commit an act of verbal abuse, abusive language, booming the body spatially close to the body of the victim.

Even if it is an illegal use of force against a victim, it constitutes violence, and Supreme Court Decision 2000Do5716 Decided January 10, 2003.