Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Reasons

(1) Defendant C only participated in receipt, supplied materials and supplied them to the public. The construction cost was paid after deducting only necessary expenses. (9) Defendant C directly paid to its father in 207, and in 2008, Defendant C paid labor cost on the basis of various tax invoices, copies of deposit passbooks, etc. (10) from Defendant B’s office on June 15, 2009 with regard to “F court 315 legal subcontract,” which was concluded on 209.0 and later on February 26, 2009, Defendant C’s statement of payment from Defendant C’s office was discovered to the effect that “the F court 315 legal subcontract,” which was signed on 200 and later on February 26, 2009, was included in “the F court 30 and later on February 3, 2009” as “the instant documents related to the construction work, which were seized by Defendant B’s office, to the end of the 20th anniversary of the instant contractual construction work.”