If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 18, 2017, around 20:36, the Defendant was urged to return home from C(43 tax) in the position of the Incheon Southern East Police Station B (43 tax), who was dispatched to the site by the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, to the above C, without a reason, on the front day of the Nam-gu Incheon Namdong-gu, Incheon, and the 920 of the prisoner of war in front of the Jinsan apartment apartment commercial building (Tan-gu 3-dong commercial building), wherein the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and did not get from the taxi, and on the front day of the 112-dong, Incheon.

C. The bitch bitch bitch bitch, which can be seen as a police officer’s bomb, bitch bitch.

C. "P." and assaulted the head of the above C at the time of drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on public safety and maintenance of order related to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable condition: The defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake.

The defendant has no record of punishment, except that he/she has been punished by a fine.

Unfavorable circumstances: It is necessary to severely punish police officers in order to enhance their trust in national public authority with respect to their acts of obstructing the performance of public duties.