However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 11. 9. 03:40경 울산 남구 B에 있는 울산남부경찰서 C지구대에서, 폭행사건 피혐의자로 조사를 받기 위하여 대기하던 중, 폭행사건 상대방 측 사람들과 계속하여 이야기를 하려고 하여 위 지구대 소속 경위 D가 “분리 조사가 필요하니, 안쪽에 있는 사무실로 가자.”고 말하여 피고인을 다른 곳으로 데려가려고 하자, 위 D에게 “씹할, 놔라“라고 소리치면서 발로 위 D의 허벅지를 1회 찼다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence is determined as per the disposition, comprehensively taking account of all the following factors: (a) the basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] under the influence of alcohol; (b) the basic area (6-1-1 year and April) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence); (c) the fact that it did not lead to a serious result; (d) the fact that the mistake was contrary to the defendant's age, character,