beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.07.13 2015가합41513

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant,

A. Plaintiff A: 517,858,400 won; 20,000,000 won to Plaintiff B; and 100,000,000 won to Plaintiff D; and

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The judicial police officers of the defendant's illegal confinement and investigation against the plaintiffs A, C, and E committed criminal acts without a warrant on July 31, 1981, the plaintiff C, the plaintiff Eul on August 2, 1981, the plaintiff Eul on September 11, 1981, and the plaintiff Eul on September 11, 1981. Until a detention warrant against the above plaintiffs is issued (the plaintiff A and C are issued each detention warrant on October 15, 1981), they forced them to make a confession of criminal acts while investigating the above plaintiffs with illegal confinement.

B. On February 23, 1982, the court of first instance acquitted the Plaintiffs A of some of the charges of violation of the National Security Act, violation of public law, violation of the Martial Law Act, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, concealment of criminals, violation of the National Security Act, violation of the anti-public law, violation of the Martial Law, violation of the Martial Law, and violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act. On February 23, 1982, the court of first instance acquitted the Defendants A of some of the charges of violation of the Martial Law, found the remainder of guilty and seven years of imprisonment and suspension of qualifications, three years and six years of imprisonment, three years and six years of suspension of qualifications, three years and six months of qualification, and two years of qualification suspension for the Plaintiff C, and two years of imprisonment for the Plaintiff E (Seoul District Court Decision 81Da7929, 8628 (Joint). 2). The court of first instance reversed the part of the above charges of suspension of qualifications and six years of qualifications for each of the Defendants E and six months of the judgment.

(Dagsan District Court 82No1099, hereinafter referred to as the "Supreme Court Decision on Review") . 3) The above plaintiffs and the prosecutor (excluding plaintiffs E) filed all appeals against the above plaintiffs.