If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant made telephone conversations with a person in distress (one name C) in his/her residence located in Daegu-gu Office B, Daegu-gu, and agreed to receive 1.2 million won in return, if he/she lent two physical card under the name of the Defendant to the person in distress. On the same day, the Defendant sent Kwikseter service articles who sent the above name to the article in distress, one physical card connected to the national bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant, one check card connected to the bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant, and two physical cards, such as one check card, connected to the Korean bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant. The Defendant sent the above French to the article in question, respectively, the Defendant informed the password of the above physical card to the Kakao x.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the interrogation of the suspect against the accused (including account details);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (a copy, a case of F contact, August 5, 2016), a copy of an investigation report (a copy of a suspect G arrest report, August 3, 2016), a search and seizure inspection warrant (a copy of a search and seizure inspection warrant, August 31, 2016), and a criminal investigation report (verification of stamp background, etc.).

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;