2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

The grounds for recognition: In full view of the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 and 5 of the judgment as to the grounds for the claim against Defendant B and C, the Plaintiff is the owner of the apartment building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) and the facts that Defendant B and C currently reside in the instant building, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff, the owner of the instant building.

Defendant B and C’s assertion that Defendant B and C should reside until the expiration of the lease deposit under the lease agreement on the instant building. As such, there is no evidence to acknowledge that Defendant B and C concluded a lease agreement on the instant building with the Plaintiff on the ground that the said assertion was unable to comply with the Plaintiff’s request for delivery until the payment of the lease deposit. Thus, the above Defendants’ assertion is without merit without need to further examine.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is accepted for each reason.