A. On August 16, 2007, Nonparty B is a Class 6 dump truck C vehicle (hereinafter “instant dump truck”) around 15:20 on August 16, 2007.

(B) A traffic accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”) involving the Plaintiff’s drive D while stopping on a road near the National Maritime Police Agency located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”).

2) The Defendant concluded a comprehensive insurance contract for commercial automobiles with respect to the insurance period from February 27, 2007 to February 27, 2008.

3) On the day of the instant traffic accident, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with the scopical base and the scopic base at E, and was diagnosed with the scopical base, the scopical base, the scopic base, and the 4-5 conical base at F Hospital on August 18, 2007. The Plaintiff was treated with the scopic surface at F Hospital from August 18, 2007 to September 1, 2007, respectively from G from September 3, 2007 to G from G from September 10, 207 to G from several medical institutions thereafter. The Plaintiff was treated with the scopic source after being treated with the scopic source. The Plaintiff was not liable for damages due to the scopic ground for the instant traffic accident, according to the following circumstances: (i) the Plaintiff was liable for damages arising from the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, 14, 18, 19, 20, 30, 14).

2. As to this, the defendant asserts to the effect that the disability claimed by the plaintiff was caused by king, and there was no causal relationship with the traffic accident of this case.

According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence 28, Eul evidence 24-2, Eul evidence 4-1, and Eul evidence 4-4, the plaintiff was diagnosed with the light dynasium and the synasium of about four months before the date of the occurrence of the instant traffic accident, and the plaintiff was diagnosed with the light dynasium and the synasium of the hynasium of April 24, 207.