수용보상금 증액
1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the claims of plaintiffs A and B expanded by this court are dismissed, respectively.
2. After an appeal is filed.
1. The reasons for this Court concerning this case are as follows: (a) each of the judgment of the first instance is dismissed by the court of the first instance as “court of the first instance”; and (b) in the 7th sentence of the judgment of the first instance, “this judgment” is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where “the court of the first instance” is deemed to be “the court of the first instance”; and (c) thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article
(2) The court of first instance, which rejected the plaintiffs' assertion, is justifiable, even if the plaintiff's assertion was not significantly different from the allegations made in the first instance trial, and the evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance trial were re-examineed). 2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and thus, the plaintiffs' appeal and the claims of the plaintiff A and B expanded in this court are dismissed as they are without merit.