손실보상금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.
1. Details of ruling;
A. The Plaintiffs are the owners of each land indicated in the “land subject to accommodation” in the attached Table [Attachment 1] (hereinafter “each land of this case”; and when individually named each land, the Plaintiffs are the owners of each land of this case according to the sequences.
B. Business Approval and Public Notice - Pyeongtaek-si G business [H First and Second Business] (hereinafter referred to as each of the above business “the First Business” and “the Second Business” and “the Project in this case” collectively): The Public Notice of Gyeonggi-do on December 5, 2013 and the Public Notice of Gyeonggi-do on May 29, 2014 - The Defendant: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24870, Dec. 5, 2013>
C. Each expropriation ruling rendered on December 23, 2014 (hereinafter “each expropriation ruling”) by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal (hereinafter “each expropriation ruling”): The first project (Plaintiff B, C, D, and E) of this case - Land subject to compensation: The amount indicated in the column for “amount of expropriation” Nos. 1 through 10 of the attached Table 1 [Attachment Table 1] - Compensation: The starting date of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on February 6, 2015 - The second project (PlaintiffF) of this case: An appraisal corporation on February 6, 2015 - An appraisal corporation and a two appraisal corporations (hereinafter “Appraisal Corporation”) - The second project subject to compensation: the amount indicated in the column for “amount of expropriation” in the attached Table 11 and 12.
- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation for a corporation and a Pacific appraisal corporation for a corporation on February 6, 2015;
D. The Central Land Tribunal rendered each objection on June 25, 2015 (hereinafter “each objection”) - Contents of the adjudication: Compensation for losses for each land of this case was modified as indicated in the attached Table 1.
- An appraisal corporation 1) The primary business of this case: An appraisal corporation at sight and a joint appraisal corporation 2) The second business of this case: An appraisal corporation at Alban and an appraisal corporation at one appraisal corporation
E. The result of the commission of appraisal to K by the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal”) - Contents of appraisal: attached Table 2.