beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2021.02.16 2019나64591

공사대금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment to the plaintiff A in excess of the following amount shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The E-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-D-B-B-B-B-B-B-D-B-B-B-B-D-B-B-B-D-B-B-D-B-D-D-B-D.

2) At the time the Defendant entered into a subcontract with the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. for the instant construction project, L is responsible for and complete the instant construction project within the scope of the amount of KRW 2,680,00,00 in the above-mentioned manner (i.e., basic type 2,083,725,332 expansion type 596,274,68, whichever is about 92.10% of the amount subcontracted by the Defendant from the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.).