Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On March 10, 2015, at around 19:25, the Defendant: (a) discovered as the above C points operated by the victim for the following reasons: (b) on the ground that: (c) the Defendant, while drinking alcohol in the Defendant’s restaurant at the Defendant’s restaurant; (d) the Defendant had the Victim G asked to bring money to the Defendant; and (e) had the Finger would have attempted to bring money to the Defendant, and (e) had the Defendant her talked with the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant did not have any such speech, the Defendant was unable to bring a disturbance for about 40 minutes, such as having the Defendant her talked with the instant C points operated by the victim for the said C points.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s Category C business by force, such as finding out customers who come out of the place, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning G police statements;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is about 40 minutes by the defendant obstructing the business of the victim by neglecting his/her behavior at the main point in the management of the victim, and the quality of the crime is not weak.

However, the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., in which the defendant is against the defendant, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim.