However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

The Defendant, as the actual operator of a limited company C in Yong-Namnam-gun, is an employer who operates the business of manufacturing vessel components by using 20 full-time workers. From January 20, 201 to April 30, 2014, the Defendant did not pay KRW 4,900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by each police officer's statement about E (including the F's statement entry part), G, H (including the E's statement entry part), and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in written statements in J, K and D;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Whether each of the allowances and wages is unpaid: Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act;

(b) Unpaid retirement benefits: Article 44 subparagraph 1 and Article 9 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime regarding selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1));

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 (1) of the Act on Probation, etc.;