도로법위반
The defendant is innocent.
1. Specific facts charged [2013 Height 1754] A violation of the vehicle operation restriction [2013 Height 1755] around June 2, 2006 by a defendant's employee [2013 Height 1755] A's violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 20:50 on February 17, 200 of the defendant's employee [2013 Height 1756] A's violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 16:02 on March 8, 200 of the defendant's employee [203 Height 1757] A's violation of the vehicle operation restriction around 16: 200 on September 16: 13, 198 by the defendant's employee / [203 Height 1758 on June 16, 2019]
2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.
Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.