승낙의 의사표시
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims that have been changed in exchange in the trial are dismissed.
2. The plaintiffs' total costs of litigation.
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence 2 to 10 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, 3 to 11, 13, and 14.
(1) Around 2002, the State Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd. (K non-Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd.) and the Jeju Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “HA”) entered into a trust agreement with the C Rental Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Lease Apartment”) falling under the publicly constructed rental housing of Article 2 subparag. 1 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Rental Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 18315, Mar. 17, 2004) (hereinafter “Lease apartment of this case”), which is newly constructed on A and on the ground of the Jeju Industries, around September 16, 2002.
(2) On April 9, 2002, the K non-real estate trust obtained approval for the invitation of occupants on April 9, 2002, and announced the invitation of occupants to the homeless householders residing in the leisure time, and all the homeless householders applied for occupancy on the first first-come first-served basis.
Therefore, from around April 2002, the case real estate trust and the Plaintiffs concluded a lease agreement with the term of lease from November 15, 2002 to five years with respect to each of the relevant households indicated in the “multi-family housing” column of the attached sales contract table among the instant rental apartments.
(3) On August 29, 2007, the Defendant purchased the instant rental apartment from the K non-real estate trust, succeeded to the status as a rental business operator of the K non-real estate trust, and completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant rental apartment on November 30, 2007 under the name of the Defendant.
(4) From December 2007, the Defendant concluded a lease contract with the Plaintiffs whose lease term expires, including extension of the lease term with the Defendant.
B. The Defendant approved for conversion of the instant rental apartment to sale in lots on October 2010 to the female Mayor.