피고인은 2018. 11. 21. 14:40경 대구 달성군 B에 있는 C 외부 화장실 대변기에서 하의를 내린 채 앉아서 소리를 지르다가 신고를 받고 출동한 대구달성경찰서 D파출소 소속 경위 E, 순경 F으로부터 귀가할 것을 종용받자 술에 취해 화가 나, 욕설을 하면서 손으로 위 E의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고 발로 다리 부위를 2회 걷어차고, 발로 위 F의 다리 부위를 2회 걷어찼다.

계속하여 피고인은 현행범으로 체포되어 같은 날 17:00경 대구 달성군 G에 있는 위 D파출소 앞에서 대구성서경찰서 유치장으로 입감되기 위해 순찰차에 탑승하다가 동행하던 위 D파출소 소속 순경 H의 얼굴 부위를 발로 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties in relation to the crime prevention and suppression of the above E, F, and H, who weared police uniforms, and at the same time damaged the face that requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, F, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the field photographs, diagnostic records, and police boxes, CCTV photographs, video CDs, and 112 reported case handling records;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one month to ten years;

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

A. First Crimes (Determination of Punishment) (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties). [Attachment 1] There is no obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of official duties (Special Aggravation) (Scope of Recommendation and Recommendation] basic area, six months to one year and six months (general person who is sentenced to punishment)

(b) No. 2 crime (influence of types) (influence of types) and violence crime, general injury (Type 1).