2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 00:20, the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building “In front of the road”; (b) caused the victim B (n, 27 years of age) scambling the Defendant’s proposal on the same day through tamping scam, thereby damaging the victim’s cell phone, and destroying the victim’s face by scambling the victim’s cell phone on the floor; (c) caused the victim’s left hand by a defect in the victim’s cell phone, and (d) caused the victim’s loss by scambling the Defendant at one time; and (d) caused the victim’s scam in front of the victim’s body by scambling the victim’s head by scambling the Defendant’s scam on one occasion; and (d) caused the victim to scambling the head of the cement; and (d) caused the victim to scam in the cement.

Chewing year, I said that the country's military system should be given in a way much.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the victim to use the victim's 6 floud phone 429,00 won to repair the victim's 6 floud phone, and caused approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim, and caused the victim's ma, face, and floud and strawing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. On-site photographs of the case;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV video image analysis and CD);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Submission of a written estimate), written estimate, or damaged mobile phone photographs;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 257(1) of the so-called Criminal Act (board of bodily injury, imprisonment)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of favorable sentencing factors, among the following grounds for sentencing):

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 32(1)3 and Article 25(3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss Applications for Compensation Orders (including records of this case).