If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On February 23, 2013, from around 16:34 to 17:36, the Defendant participated in the assembly of “B-Gu Emergency Stacks pending issues and the 10th task-handling 10th National Assembly,” which was hosted by B-ro 1, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, in the vicinity of the B-ro, and occupied the two-way lanes prior to the road by 2,50 participants in other assemblies.

Accordingly, the defendant, together with the above 2,500 persons, prevented them from passing the vehicle on the road, thereby hindering the traffic on the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to a report on outdoor assembly) and a report on outdoor assembly;

1. Investigation report (in progress by time);

1. Situation report;

1. 112 Reporting case management table;

1. The defendant's photographic materials and photographs (the defendant alleged that he was driven in compliance with the reported lane, but see, e.g., Article 28 of the investigation records of the inventor's photographic materials, and Article 97 of the investigation records of the photographic materials, etc., it can be recognized that the defendant significantly deviates from the scope of the original report and obstructs road traffic. Thus, the defendant's argument

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;