However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 1. 31. 02:50경 안양시 동안구 D건물 2층에 있는 ‘E’에서, 피고인 일행과 피해자 F이 눈이 마주쳤다는 이유로 시비하게 되자, 그곳 탁자 위에 놓여 있던 위험한 물건인 소주병을 집어 들어 피해자 F과 그 일행인 피해자 G, 피해자 H을 향하여 휘두르고, 탁자 위에 놓여 있던 위험한 물건인 유리로 된 맥주컵을 집어 들어 피해자 F의 머리 부분을 약 3회 내리치고, 이를 말리는 피해자 G의 얼굴 부분을 위와 같은 과정에서 날카롭게 깨진 위 맥주컵으로 1회 내려치고, 피해자 H의 얼굴 부분을 주먹으로 약 4회 때리고 왼쪽 다리 부분을 발로 1회 걷어찼다.

As such, the Defendant, using the so-called so-called scam with a shouldered so-called scam with a dangerous object, applied approximately 4 cm in length to the victim G, approximately 3 cm in width, 4 cm in inner part of the size of 3 cm in width, the victim H’s internal part of the number of days of treatment, and the victim F’s two unscam in number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. A criminal investigation report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant agreed with the victims, and the fact that the defendant is an initial offender and is against the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for discretionary mitigation)

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;