Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A around July 29, 2003, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, a violation of vehicle operation restriction on the roads prior to the Ulsan Metropolitan Office. 2. Punishment provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 29, 201, 201, 201Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, 2008Hun-Ga17, Supreme Court Decision 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009]. Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.