A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Defendant

A is the operator of the real estate sales agent corporation D, and the defendant B is the head of the corporation's headquarters.

At around 22:00 on November 12, 2015, Defendants, while drinking alcohol at F amusement stations located in E, with intent to evade the drinking value by misrepresenting the inspection, on the ground that they did not enter the entrance of the female employees and promptly introduce new female employees, and by threatening the owner of the business as if they investigate various illegal matters of the said establishment.

Accordingly, the defendant A, who is an employee of the above entertainment shop, should be aware that the prosecutor has been employed in this case, and it is well aware that the prosecutor was employed.

. Does we see the foregoing, and see it, but see the victim H (W, 52 years old) that is the owner of the business who does not enter the stud, and then write the stud frob, “Woo Woo,” and sound “Woo Woo,” and then, “in these forms, the drinking value has not been paid, and the water’s age does not employ a minor on the ground that the water’s age can only be seen as living at the temperature;

As long as we could not engage in funeral services, the defendant B was the prosecutor of the defendant B, thereby threatening the victim's business to regulate the illegal matters, and the defendant B took the same action, and the defendant B took the same action as the prosecutor.

As a result, the Defendants jointly threatened the victim and evaded the drinking value of 150,000 won from the person suffering from drinking, thereby acquiring financial benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by each prosecutor with respect to H, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the filing of photographs of the victims taken from CCTV at the F main point and the specific report of the victims in question);

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2) and Article 2(1)3 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016); and Article 2(1)3 of the Criminal Act.