However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the D Teachers of C Kindergartens in Pyeongtaek-si B, and the victim E (tentative name, four years of age), F (tentative name, four years of age), G (tentative name, four years of age), H (n), and H (n, four years of age) are the above D original students.

1. On 2018, the Defendant committed the crime in the name of the Defendant: (a) at the above kindergarten D class around the 2018, the victim E head was placed, and (b) at the buckbucks and tacks.

As a result, the Defendant committed physical abuse that inflicts bodily harm on the child.

2. On November 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 14:30 on November 1, 2018, the Defendant forced the victims to open the classroom for about 15 minutes on the ground that the victim F, the victim G, and the victim H do not hear the horses of the Defendant in the above kindergarten D class; (b) two times on the bridge of the victim F, four times on the bridge of the victim G, and one time on the bridge of the victim H; and (c) opened the Defendant’s bridge on one hand on one hand on another; and (d) obstructed the victim F’s chest on one hand.

As a result, the Defendant committed physical abuse that inflicts bodily harm on the child.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Stenographic records (E statements);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (with respect to the analysis of CCTV images on November 1, 11).

1. Article 71 (1) 2 of the Child Welfare Act and Article 17 subparagraph 3 of the same Article concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The period of restriction on employment is imposed upon the Defendant by taking into account various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation and environment, social ties, opening of his/her family, the degree and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage due to the employment restriction order, the prevention of child abuse-related crimes that can be achieved by the employment restriction order, and the effect of protecting the victims of children, etc. from child abuse-related crimes.