소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
The reasoning for the court's explanation on the instant case is that the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the rejection of each statement or image of Gap evidence Nos. 13 through 18 (including a serial number), which is insufficient to recognize "the plaintiff, directly or indirectly, possessed the instant land and the instant forest for not less than 20 years through the succession of possession (in particular, the fact that the plaintiff has occupied the instant land and the instant forest by indirect possession through Nonparty S and U)" as evidence submitted in addition to the trial, since it is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.