However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a member of the Democratic Labor Group C, and Defendant B is the head of the Democratic Labor Group C Organization. The Defendants are members of each D Party. While the participants in an assembly or demonstration were prohibited from doing any act that disturbs the order by assault, intimidation, destruction, fire prevention, etc., the Defendants conspired with the names of poor boxes. Defendants were present at the F Party in the North Korean territory, from November 16, 2013 to 17:20 of the same day, at the front of the F Party in Gwangju North Korean territory, the Defendants participated in the meeting at the “Resolution on the pulverization of Sulver,” organized by the Democratic Labor Group C (G) and were present at the “Resolution on the pulververization of the F Party in his name,” and the police officers of the Gwangju Regional Police Agency who were waiting before the F Party in order to enter the F Party. Defendant A stopped the police officers of the above H's name and face at the time the police officers assigned to the above H, and the police officers of the said 1 pul et al. were al.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to participate in an assembly or demonstration to disturb order by violence, etc., and at the same time interfered with the execution of official duties by assaulting police officers in the process of crime prevention, public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. The K's statement;

1. The video CD in front of the FIE;

1. An information status report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of documentary evidence reading photographs;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions on criminal facts: Article 24 subparag. 5, Articles 18 (1), and 16 (4) subparag. 2 of the Assembly and Demonstration Act (the violation of the Act on Assembly and Demonstration due to an act that disturbs public order) and Articles 136 (1) and 30 of each Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Article 40 and Article 40 of the Criminal Act.