1. The punishment of the accused shall be four months of imprisonment;

2.Provided, That it shall be for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2016 Highest 385] Defendant A, at around 21:10 on September 29, 2015, had Defendant A her fightd with the victim in the process of stating that Defendant B had a dispute with the victim F (the age of 49) and outside the E “E”, and that the victim would be “dward.”

Defendant

A, with both hand, pushed the victim's arms in the sand president near "E" while being pushed the victim's arms, and Defendant B, in combination with this, pushed the victim with both hands, pushed the victim into the sand president by breaking down the victim's hand, pushed the victim into the sand president. Defendant A again pushed the victim's face to go beyond the sand president, and followed the part of the victim's face.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victims, such as the spathal of the baby requiring treatment for about four weeks.

[2016 Highest 422]

1. On June 3, 2016, Defendant B operated a coo motor vehicle in G while under the influence of alcohol by 0.134% without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of a mutually undeveloped restaurant in front of the high-speed road in the city of Jinjin-si to the front of a 3km-dong forest apartment at the same time and without obtaining a driver’s license from around 3 km section to the front of a forest apartment.

2. Defendant B, at around 21:07 on June 3, 2016, forged his signature in the name of the J for the purpose of exercising the “driver’s statement” as stated in the “A” column of the “A” statement of “A” in the “A” report, etc., which was discovered to be driven by drinking on the front of the Haak-dong Forest apartment on the front of the Haak-gu Police Station, Chungcheongnam-gu Police Station, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul. On the same day, Defendant B forged the signature of the J for the purpose of exercising the “J” on the front of the Haak-gu Forest apartment. In that place, Defendant B, who signed the “A” whose signature was forged, was genuine to I who was aware of the forgery.