A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

(a) No person shall damage or fire a road, waterway, or bridge, or obstruct traffic by any other means;

Nevertheless, around November 15, 2013, the steel pole was set up on the F-gun of Gyeonggi-do Yangyang-gun road, installed a brupt, and obstructed traffic by locking the land by locking it.

(b) No person who is registered under the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder's Name shall register any real right to real estate in the name of the title trustee pursuant to the title trust agreement;

Nevertheless, around May 21, 2013 from the case other than the G, the purchase of the F land of the Gyeonggi-do Yangyang-gun, and on May 22, 2013, the Suwon District Court registered the transfer of ownership in the name of Defendant B, and around November 27, 2013, the transfer of ownership was registered in the name of H representative I in the name of Defendant B.

2. Defendant B

C. The Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name (title trustee) transferred the land purchased by Defendant A as above at the same time and place, and was entrusted with the registration of ownership transfer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of Defendant A’s legal statement and Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The witness J or K's legal statement;

1. A written complaint and documents attached thereto;

1. Application of statutes on police statements concerning L;

1. Article 185 of the Criminal Act (the point of general traffic obstruction, the selection of fines), Articles 7 (1) 1 and 3 (1) (the point of each title trust, the selection of fines) of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name, Defendant B: Articles 7 (2) and 3 (1) of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name, the selection of fines;

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant A and the defense counsel on the argument of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding provisional payment order in this case.