사기등
A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
"2013 Highest 973"
1. A thief: (a) around 02:30 on May 30, 2013, the Defendant: (b) took alcohol at the “Dju store” located in Asan City; (c) took advantage of the gap of neglect of caution; (d) took advantage of the difference of the market price of 1,000,000 won owned by the employee victim E, who was taking advantage of the gap, the Defendant stolen and stolen property worth KRW 1,80,000, total of 1,800,000 with an interview mobile phone owned by 1,00,000 won at the market price of 80,000,000.
2. On May 30, 2013, around 05:36, the Defendant made a false statement as if the Defendant would pay the Defendant with the Defendant’s payment of the price at the “H key point” in the “H key point” of the Victim G management in Asia-si, Asan-si.
However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the defendant was provided with alcohol, speech, etc. from the victim.
The Defendant provided the victim with an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 50,000,00, which is the sum of the market price of KRW 20,000,00, and KRW 30,000,000, such as the market price of KRW 50,000, and acquired it by fraud. The Defendant provided the singing service equivalent to KRW 20,00,000, and provided the entertainment equivalent to the service fee of KRW 25,00, and did not pay the service fee of KRW 25,00.
Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the property equivalent to the total market value of 95,00 won and acquired the property profit.
On November 20, 2013, 2013, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol as if he would pay the alcohol value to the victim to the victim in the 6th place of the "Kjuk Point in the operation of the victim JJ on the I underground floor in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si."
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any other way to pay the drinking value while there was no money at the time, and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the said price even if the Defendant was provided with alcoholic beverage and alcohol by the victim.
In other words, the defendant is the victim from the victim.