2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice) of the applicable provisions of Acts;

3. The Plaintiff seeking payment of interest or delay damages calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from December 23, 2009, the date of issuance of a promissory note, but there is no evidence to prove that the due date of the payment of the promissory note was June 30, 2010, and there is no other interest agreement until the due date. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion seeking payment of interest from December 23, 2009 to June 30, 2010 is without merit, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the agreement to pay delay damages calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from July 1, 2010, the next day to December 10, 2016, which is the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case. Thus, there is no evidence to acknowledge the agreement to pay delay damages calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act.